24/02/2021

Voices and insights from Indonesia’s rising human rights cities movement

(* This report has been developed thanks to our partnership with INFID - Photo source: INFID and KOMNAS HAM)

Over the last years, numerous Indonesian local and national stakeholders have taken an increasingly prominent role in global human rights city discussions. Spearheading the consolidation of the human rights cities movement in the Asia Pacific region along other actors in Gwangju’s World Human Rights Cities Forum - WHRCF (South Korea), the Indonesian contribution has also played a fundamental role at the global level, as it allowed to expand the recognition of local governments’ role in the promotion and protection of human rights. How is this international momentum connected to local realities in Indonesia? What innovative policy examples can be found among the country’s more than 500 regencies (kabupaten) and cities (kota)? This report sheds light on these questions, building on the expertise of active local governments and partners of the Committee in Indonesia.


Multi-stakeholder cooperation has been key to mainstream local human rights engagement in Indonesia

The origins of the human rights cities movement in Indonesia date back to almost a decade ago, when various local governments and human rights defenders participated in the WHRCF of Gwangju. Back then, these pioneers identified the human rights city concept as a good opportunity to promote human rights from the bottom-up and with a long-term vision, taking advantage of the increasing consolidation of local democracy after the fall of Indonesia’s authoritarian regime (late 1990s). Indeed, the Indonesian and Korean human rights cities movement share the key trait of having pushed for human rights city strategies almost in parallel to nationwide democratization processes. In both cases, the effective convergence of innovative local democracy experiences and social activism played a key role to promote and protect human rights.

A good example of effective multi-stakeholder cooperation, the human rights city agenda in Indonesia has received the valuable backing of civil society and national stakeholders since its inception. Therefore, both institutions supported the political will of local leaders through various ways. Since the 2000s, Indonesia’s national government has pushed for a strong decentralization agenda touching also on human rights matters. The role of the National Human Rights Commission (KOMNAS HAM) and the National Action Plan on Human Rights (RANHAM) has been key in this process. Since the 2010s, these national human rights stakeholders have carried out well structured promotion strategies seeking to inspire more local governments to develop their own initiatives on human rights and harmonize local and international laws.

The contribution of civil society organizations such as the International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development (INFID) has also been fundamental in both promoting the human rights city concept across the country as well as in supporting policy development at the level of cities and regencies. With regards to the first, INFID has organized, on a yearly basis and along other actors such as the KOMNAS HAM, a National Human Rights Festival (Festival HAM) which made the human rights city concept widely popular among Indonesian local authorities and human rights defenders. With regards to the second, civil society participation in the definition of local human rights strategies allowed to ensure that these processes adopted participatory methodologies, were reactive to the needs of all residents, local officers were well capacitated and coordinated with existing initiatives on the ground.



Key thematic priorities and human rights policy examples

Local human rights policy development in Indonesia is characterized by the diversity of thematic priorities addressed. A key approach developed by many local authorities through this vision is that of fostering full citizenship and conviviality, preventing the sources of intolerance and extremism through reinforced social dialogue, campaigning and remedy. Many other local authorities developed a more specific focus on social and economic rights, reaching to this end the poorest or more disadvantaged through social economy or education initiatives. The human rights city vision has allowed for advanced equal treatment, as many local governments also developed daring policies in the field of gender equality.

The human rights city of Palu (391.383 hab.) focused for instance on supporting access to the right to remedy for victims of past human rights violations, and to addressing local historical memory with a view to fostering conviviality and equality in the present. Palu counts with its own Human Rights City Declaration (2013) commiting to enforce non-discrimination measures and protect the rights of minorities. Bojonegoro (1.301.635 hab.) followed a similar path with regards to resolving social conflict through memory recovery and promotion of non-discrimination. The establishment of a District Head Regulation and the reinforcement of social dialogue with local stakeholders has been key in order to further consolidate these policies. The case of Aceh Province (5.459.891 hab.) provides another good example on how local and regional governments in Indonesia played a fundamental role in advancing truth and reconciliation initiatives.

[ Know more : Our Committee takes part in the Festival HAM 2019 held in Jember ]

Other cities and regencies have given a more specific focus to the issue of social and economic rights. Jember (2.536.729 hab.) redoubled social spending (provision of new scholarships, fostering ambulance services, supporting social economy initiatives) with a view to widen people’s access to education, healthcare and employment. This type of policy intervention has been implemented by other localities as well, such as Bogor (1.096.828 hab.), Serdang Bedagai (642.824) or Pakpak Bharat (48.119 hab.).

The Wonosobo Regency strategy on human rights: An advanced example of policy institutionalization

A pioneer local government in embracing the human rights city vision in Indonesia is without doubt that of Wonosobo: A Regency located in Central Java which has a population of 790.491 inhabitants distributed into fifteen districts. Wonosobo represents a diverse territory, comprising both urban and rural areas, and having a poverty rate slightly superior to that of the national average. For more than 7 years, local government leaders and civil society stakeholders have worked together to develop Wonosobo’s human rights city strategy, focused on embracing the welcoming and diverse personality of the territory to articulate a human rights policy vision. As in other territories, preventing intolerance has been a key priority for the local authorities, but also reinforcing social inclusion policies.View of Wonosobo sunset

The institutionalization process of Wonosobo human rights vision has been characterized by the active engagement of local leaders and public workers as well as the broad participation of civil society stakeholders and human rights defenders. The establishment of a Regional Human Rights Law and a Human Rights City Taskforce kicked off the institutionalization process in 2016. Similar to the local human rights declarations and offices of other human rights cities across the world, these two mechanisms allowed to start mobilizing public resources and defining a specific strategy on human rights. This would focus on women, children, people with disabilities, older people and the relationship with the environment.

Such efforts led to the establishment of a Regional Human Rights Commission in 2018, the same year by which Wonosobo hosted the Festival HAM. This new institution gave more prominence to the human rights policy discussion at a legislative level, while facilitating new means for human rights campaigning, awareness raising and capacity building at the level of Wonosobo localities. The Taskforce would maintain its coordination role within local public administration, liasing with the Mayor’s office while directly addressing residents’ demands. Since its inception, the Taskforce has been composed by local government representatives with a good knowledge of human rights that are also well connected to the work of activists.

Due to the COVID-19 crisis, the local human rights strategy of Wonosobo has had to adapt to the new circumstances and unprecedented challenges posed by the pandemic. One of the main innovations to be soon implemented by local authorities is the new “Human Rights Complaint Tool”, which will offer residents a direct channel to denounce human rights violations or challenges to local authorities. This channel will be based on both digital technologies as well as physical spaces across the Regency. In short, members of the community will have a new tool to monitor and report the human rights situation.

Contributing to the global human rights cities movement

At a global level, Indonesia’s contribution has been key to consolidating the human rights cities movement: From networking dynamics developed within the WHRCF to the recognition processes endeavoured at the Human Rights Council. This has relied on the engagement of active local governments and national actors like the KOMNAS HAM, various Ministries and Indonesia’s Permanent Mission in Geneva. The participation of NGOs such as INFID and other local human rights defenders allowed to draw an even larger picture and collection of Indonesian voices to these efforts.

In perspective, this contribution also provided a wealth of resources that can be of support to human rights cities across the world: From learning tools and capacity building experience to meaningful connections to human rights activists and entrepreneurs at a regional and global level. In coming years, Indonesian voices are expected to remain crucial in defining the new horizons of the movement.


View of the Festival Ham held in Wonosobo last 2018


Know more about Indonesia’s Human Rights Cities Movement